Cushion Compact (Expensive VS Affordable)
12:04 PMWATER CUSION VS AMOREPACIFIC
[FACESHOP]
AROUND $20- $30 $60
APPLICATION:
COOLING EFFECT THE FIRST FELT COOL BUT I FELT THE AND LIGHT WEIGHT. MAKE UP ON THE FACE. NOT AS DID NOT FEEL THE MAKE UP LIGHT WEIGHT. GAVE MY SKIN
THE WHOLE DAY. SMOOTH LOOK.
SKIN LOOKED SMOOTH BUT
NOT AS SMOOTH AS AMOREPACIFIC.
CUSHION:
SOFT AND NOT AS DENSE DENSE
PRODUCT:
WATERY AND LIGHT HENCE THE SOFT CONSISTENCY WAS CUSHION TO ABSORB THE PRODUCT HEAVIER HENCE THE DENSE CREATING EVEN APPLICATION. CUSHION.
SKIN TYPE:
FOR MY SKIN TYPE IT IS OILY AND DRY (COMBINATION). I PREFERRED THE WATER CUSHION FROM THE FACESHOP. MY SKIN DID NOT FEEL AS OILY WHEN I WORE THE AMOREPACIFIC.
COVERAGE:
WATER CUSION IS NOT MEANT FOR HEAVY COVERAGE. IT HELPED COVER BLEMISHES OR AN UNEVEN SKIN TONE. IT BRIGHTENED BY SKIN AND GAVE A FLAWLESS LOOK.
AMORE PACIFIC COVERAGE WAS NOTICEABLE THAN THE WATER CUSHION. IT DID GIVE A CLEAN FLAWLESS LOOK TO THE SKIN. HELPED EVEN OUT BLEMISHES AND SKIN TONE.
WEATHER:
WATER CUSION IS RECOMMENDED FOR SUMMER FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO PRODUCE MORE OILS.
AMORE PACIFIC DOES COME IN HANDY FOR WINTER BECAUSE IT FELT MOISTURIZING THROUGH DRYNESS OF THE AIR.
IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR THE SUMMER. I TEND TO PRODUCE MORE OIL ON MY T-ZONE.
COLOR:
WATER CUSHION IS IN V203 NATURAL BEIGE. THE SALES WOMAN WAS HELPFUL CHOOSING A SHADE THAT MATCHED MY LIGHT SKIN TONE.
AMORE PACIFIC, THE SALES WOMAN PICKED THE WRONG SHADE THINKING THE TAN GOLD (204) WOULD COMPLIMENT MY LIGHT SKIN. HOWEVER IT MADE MY SKIN TONE LOOK BIT YELLOW.
I WOULD ADVISE TO JUST GET LIGHT/MEDIUM PINK (104).
OVERALL:
BOTH PRODUCTS ARE GREAT BUT IT REALLY IS AN INDIVIDUAL PREFERENCE. I LIKED BOTH BUT I WOULD LIKE TO KEEP EXPERIMENTING WITH DIFFERENT CUSHION COMPACTS.
0 comments